Works for me and that’s all I care about. It doesn’t mean it’s the best or better than other’s. Building complexity is usually a compelling event for the designer. There are other ways of designing with more flushing angles (by means of simple angled holes) but require welding parts. The design shown above is for a 300 BlkO, it’s 1.5 inches long and 6 different flushing axis (Hexagon) with 2 flushing paths (0.725 index). Now you have the design criteria’s for all 3. Finally, think on how to speed it up: Spinning.Ĭaliber matters, yes Point 1 is directly related to it: Muzzle Pressure, Muzzle Speed, Bullet mass, Muzzle Temp, … Now think flushing gas really fast: More than one port in the X Axis. That will give you the spreading ratio (the more corners, the closer to the circle, the better). So, first think about the Tube Geometry (Z section): Circular (usually) and now project a Triangle, Square, Pentagon, Hexagon, … inside the Circle. Should provide me with plenty of baffle clearance, based on my readings here and elsewhere.įor me a Suppressor Friendly Blast Device should have the following features:ġ)ěe strong and short (Suppressor like).Ģ)ěe able to flush gas as soon as possible, fast (MB like).ģ)ěe able to flush as evenly as possible (FH like). 375" from the end of the comp (~ 2 1/8" from crown). 500" between the end of the comp and the blast baffle (works out to about 2 3/4" from crown) and the. I'm basing the blast baffle clearance on the actual muzzle crown (inside the comp), not the end of the comp. I'm working on a can that mounts via a collar behind the compensator. Personally, I like the idea of using a compensator like the Griffin M4SDII my theory is that it will have 90% of the effectiveness of a brake, without the side concussion that a standard-style brake would have if shooting unsuppressed. Reference thread for some good pics on an AAC setup. Much more useful on SBRs, but I don't see how it could hurt on a 16" barrel. The design of the FH or MB stays the same (In class, of course(5.56-7.62/300wm-50cal)) with the difference being size alone.įrom what I've seen, the main advantage that a brake (not break) has in a suppressor is that it works as a 'sacrificial' blast baffle and takes the brunt of the pressure and unburnt powder instead of the blast baffle getting worn. 22, but look at some of AAC's cans all the way from some of their 5.56 cans right up to their. I understand there's no point in putting a 'brake on a. How does a given caliber make a difference? Excuse me for playing dumb. So how would I make the FH/MB Silencer-Friendly? 308W Cans, 7.5 inches long performing the same as 9 inches ones. Find bellow an example, just an Insert into a standard 1.5 OD Rear Cap (please, take it just an example). So, just take the benefits of both and design something that’s Suppressor friendly. Nothing related to Sound Suppression or the Can being shorter (not past the Barrel but the OAL). Why are they actually being used in Commercial Cans ?, my guess is that it’s just to provide a QD Support for the Can. I’m not questioning at all their effectiveness in their natural environment (open), it’s only I don’t think their behavior is the same “inside”. Is it the same shooting “inside” than “outside” Home ?, no !. All suppressors purchased after will be engraved with HUXWRX.Pnl2012 wrote:OK, both MB and FH have been designed to work on the “open”, not in the “close”. *In an attempt to minimize waste, some suppressors and muzzle devices may arrive in OSS packaging while we transition to the new HUXWRX packaging.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
Details
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |